IROS 2013

A forum dedicated to multicopters since there is quite a a bit of interest among HEFA members.
User avatar
Rob
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 10:13 am

IROS 2013

Unread post by Rob » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:49 pm


User avatar
JohnOSullivan
Posts: 1219
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by JohnOSullivan » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:57 pm

A new break through or just the incorporation of added helicopter complexity to the simple multicopter planform which already works so well??
The aerobatics shown in the heli clip are impressive, but the general use of multicopters is geared towards aerial still and video recording, which the Heli demo would only produce nausea in the viewer, The are two diverse approaches to flying, each with their own applications.
Last edited by JohnOSullivan on Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
John
MAAC #5401 L
MACI (Ireland) IRL#26

User avatar
MarkL
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:42 pm

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by MarkL » Tue Nov 26, 2013 3:03 pm

In my mind the attempts to add CP elements to a multicopter is a step backwards and adds unneeded complexity and increases the cost and repair issues.

User avatar
Rob
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 10:13 am

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by Rob » Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:09 pm

I think the big advantage, if they become mainstream and mass produced, is the increase in flight time. 15% increase is significant particularly when as you stated, the idea is to hover and film.

User avatar
JohnOSullivan
Posts: 1219
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Contact:

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by JohnOSullivan » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:10 pm

15% increase in duration is Diddly, compared to the added risk, cost and complexity of installing the big rotor. The aerobatics in the video were by a true helicopter and not a hybrid Multicopter/Heli. No video was shown of the hybrid. A video of the hybrid in flight (if it flies) might be revealing.
Let's face it the true multicopter is a well stabilized, low vibration machine which is well suited to stable flight and a good photo or video platform and much simpler and reliable to use then a straight Heli or hybrid. These do have their uses, but suck wind when it comes to stable, vibration free and reliable photo platforms.
My Hex regularly flies 10 minutes and probably do13 minutes with my current batteries and can accept a 50% larger battery without a whimper. On a typical photo mission this should cover 90% of duration needs and battery changes take only seconds.
John
MAAC #5401 L
MACI (Ireland) IRL#26

User avatar
RocketManRC
Posts: 1285
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:39 pm
Contact:

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by RocketManRC » Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:48 pm

I guess you guys won't be too keen on this:

http://www.espritmodel.com/curtis-young ... ngray.aspx

I can't imagine it will be a big seller at $600 to $800!
Rick MacDonald
May you live in interesting times!

User avatar
MarkL
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:42 pm

Re: IROS 2013

Unread post by MarkL » Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:36 pm

The Youngblood quad is really meant for 3d and little more. As a platform it doesn't give any advantage for dealing with ap/av or carrying payloads. More points of failure, more vibration, etc. belts, gears, linkages. Complexity.

Post Reply